We had a Siemens SMART but abandoned it when the detector went belly up after seven years.
Bruker apex ii software professional#
The other difficulties with responses on this kind of forum is that few of us have regular experience with more than one platform which limits our ability to comment on other instruments.equally service and support varies a bit from country to country.įinally, not many of us are likely to say 'I bought instrument X and it was the worst decision of my life.' So my experience.I am a user not a professional crystallographer. What is the instrument for? How versatile do you want it to be.and in the end what is your budget. The Agilent systems have a smaller footprint as well! This is a how long is a piece of string question! Support: Agilent are fairly responsive (usually same day email reply, next day at worst), whereas Bruker have been worse than that for us in the past. Of course Pilatus-type detectors will eventually become the industry standard, once the manufacturing cost comes down, and a few other technical issues are fixed. Detector: Probably Agilent, as CCD's are a mature technology, whereas CMOS aren't, and probably need to be further developed before they are a competitive technology. X-ray source: Probably goes to Bruker (at least for microfocus tubes), as theirs is/can be air-cooled, and has a longer lifetime, although performances are comparable.
Bruker apex ii software pro#
Software: CrysAlis Pro (Agilent) is superior to APEX2 (Bruker). I agree with the previous poster, that it is a toss-up between Agilent and Bruker. I'd avoid any 'benchtop systems'.Īt all, only Rigaku is still producing one - Bruker discontinued its benchtop system and nowadays is selling 'ECO' built of their 3-circle system instead. My personal choice is Agilent, but it is because I am using it for years, I am able to repair most of problems by myself and I can continue using a new system without learning anything. With non-merohedral twins (because you must use narrow, CCD-like scans instead of several degrees wide IP scans and it costs a lot of time). However using the IP has some limitations e.g. When considering IP detector due to lower maintenance costs, I heard about some problems with Rigaku (imperfect erase), so I'd buy Stoe then (and Stoe's SW is still better than Rigaku). Please contact us for more information Home Contact Imprint.Missing. Please see → Downloads & Patches (please login to access this page).
Bruker apex ii software Patch#
A download service is available for selected software and patch releases. Software updates can be included as part of a service contract or purchased regularly. Although my direct experience is rather limited and outdated. They have good mechanic (and HPAD!) but software is not so good like Agilent or Bruker (AFAIK at least some parts of this software are based on Kuma's old KM4CCD/KM4RED - predecessor of CrysAlis - by Mathias M. In CrystalClear, cell parameters will be changed indeed, but the reflections will not be reindexed it is a pooh pooh, mainly because Rigaku outsourced the software package to people which have no idea about workflow.īut I have only one structure measured on Rigaku, there are other Rigaku users here much more experienced than me (johnewarren for example). For example, when you change cell setting in 'normal' software, it will be immediately re-indexed. Rigaku has good hardware but awful software. and it is directly supported by Agilent's software, although I am pretty sure they would be opposed to such request initially however their CCDs are pretty good also, but Bruker's Apex2 was maybe even better because of almost eliminated taper. Although I dislike CMOS detectors (my first choice would be HPAD detector because of absent taper and extremely low noise - it is even fluorescence-proof! Customer support is a local variable It is almost equal to buy Agilent or Bruker.
0 kommentar(er)
